I have a deep philosophical question for you:
If you want to feel happier should you:
- Put up with the experiences you are having and change how you feel about them?
- Or should you change the experiences into something better, so there is an external reason to feel happier?
Should a man without money persuade himself it is OK to be poor? Or should he go out and get enough money to feel glad about life? [We are brainwashed in our Christian culture to view poverty as desirable so maybe this isn’t an ideal example.]
What about a man who is overweight, unfit and unable to enjoy zestful pursuits? Should he “put up with” this state of health and feel good about himself? Die young as a result? Or start a programme and re-capture some his lost vitality?
Well the answer, I’m sure, is aspects of both. You don’t need to let yourself feel bad about what you’ve got. But the second choice has always seemed more appealing to me. You must try to better the environment you are in. I consider it a law of good living. To accept what you’ve got is a kind of defeatism, a limitation. It is a circumscribed or Conditional Happiness.
It’s perfectly fine to feel good about where you are; it need not stifle the ambition to do better! By all means enjoy the present; but don’t forget to carve yourself a bright and beautiful future! Actually, happiness is found in both aspects of this maxim. Continue reading


